Site Meter Copyright Talk » Blog Archive » A Rant in Favor of Creators

A Rant in Favor of Creators

by

The basic underlying principle behind our copyright laws is to encourage creative work by making it so that the people who create can make a living by controlling the use and sale of their works.

We’re in the midst of a revolutionary expansion of ways and means to distribute information, including creative works protected by copyright. This means the opportunity to make music, books and photos available to ever greater audiences with relatively small cost compared to traditional distribution channels. Ordinarily in the business world, the opening of new markets leads to expanded productivity and expanded profits. The irony I find in our digital technology is that while the opportunity for creative works to be distributed to a wider audience should have created more revenue for the creators, what we are actually seeing is big businesses exploiting a confusing moment in time to try and cut the creators out of the money stream. Starting with Napster in the mid-90’s, much of the legal activity over digital technology and copyright law has involved these big businesses trying to avoid paying for the use of works that they have always in the past paid for. I love free music as much as the next guy, but if it’s all free then something is wrong. I occasionally get a freebie from my local store, but if I loaded up my basket and walked out without paying everytime, I know the store would go out of business.

College students and private music lovers are not hurt by having to continue to pay for music. We still need a good model for doing so when digital file exchange is so simple (but we weathered the introduction of cassette tape recording, so I expect we’ll weather this, too). The challenge is to make sure that the actual creators benefit from the model we choose. Napster wasn’t trying to protect the rights of college students, it was trying to protect its access to free products to sell. Other companies are still carrying that banner, in lawsuits going on today.

Record Companies and search engines and internet based businesses are not the ones who need copyright laws to protect their ability to make a living. The ones who need copyright law to protect their ability to make a living from their work are the novelists, freelancers, musicians, songwriters, photographers, and artists. Don’t ever let them slip away in the undertow.


Leave a Reply


About Copyright Talk

Copyright touches writers, music lovers, teachers, musicians, businesses, artists, amateur filmmakers, students, libraries, and publishers – to name just a few! In other words, these days everyone is affected by copyright and everyone needs to have at least a basic understanding of it. Copyright Talk discusses issues and developments everyone needs to know about.

Copyright Talk Author(s)

Business & Finance Channel Posts

  • Copyright Basics in the Digital World
    Copyright. The concept is pretty simple – copyright provides a territorial claim to intellectual property (creative ideas set down in a fixed medium) that allows the creator to profit from the [...]
  • Illegal Downloading Court hearing may be Webcast
    Although the RIAA has recently said that it will stop suing individual who may be illegally sharing music files - in other words, people the RIAA believes may be infringing their copyright but not as [...]
  • There's No Law Against Being Stupid
    Or anti-social, or even just plain mean. We tend to collectively cringe at the thought of great art treasures being destroyed, and yet we allow private ownership of art works and the concurrent [...]
  • Obama's Appointments
    Washington lawyer Thomas Perrelli has been nominated by President-elect Obama for the position of associate attorney general, third in command at the Justice Department. Perrelli has much experience [...]
  • DRM for books?
    A recent column in the New York Times considers whether the ease of finding used copies of books is causing - or at least contributing to - the cratering of the publishing business. Although [...]
  • Lawsuits to End?
    The Wall Street Journal reports that the RIAA is planning to end its controversial anti-piracy strategy of filing copyright infringement lawsuits against any and all small time possible infringers, [...]
  • Google Settlement Draws Ire
    The proposed settlement between Google and various book publishers (which still needs final approval from the Court) is slowly getting more and more clear. There are more than 300 pages in the [...]
  • College Test Files
    There's a difference between access and copying. But the difference is not so intuitively obvious in the case of online archives. It is critical, however, in determining the possibility of [...]
  • Song-Swapping Lawsuits Face [real] Challenge
    The quick recap: * peer to peer file swapping is huge * recording industry believes song swapping interferes with sales * Song swapping really is a copyright infringment in many cases * Recording [...]
  • Google Agreement
    Remember the big dust-up over Google's plans to digitize all books everywhere in the world and beam them into everyone's head so all information throughout time would be universally [...]

Hot Off The Press